Years of Impressive Growth
By most measures, additive fabrication (AF) has developed and evolved impressively. The impact it is having on new product development continues to capture the attention of entrepreneurs, investors, government agencies, researchers, and others around the world. The following estimates provide perspective on the past and, hopefully, some insight into the future.
In the past four years (2004–2007), products and services for additive fabrication grew by an estimated $612 million. Put another way, the industry grew by 116% during this period.
Annual unit sales grew by more than 31 times from 1993 to 2007.
The installed base of CAD solid modeling seats for commercial use has nearly doubled since 2003.
The ratio of CAD solid modeling seats (for commercial use) to AF system installations is about 83 to 1.
AF systems were sold in 67 countries in 2007, with an estimated 71% of them being installed in the top six countries.
3D printers sold over the past four years (2004–2007) represent about 72% of the total number of additive systems installed during this period.
Nearly 58% of the Stratasys and Z Corp. installed base (combined) was shipped in the past three years (2005–2007).
Note: The previous information was taken from Wohlers Report 2008, a 240-page global study that focuses on the advances in additive fabrication worldwide. A detailed overview of the report, as well as additional information on the market and industry, are available at
Wohlers Talk: Autodesk is Now the Giant
The first time I phoned Autodesk (1983), Mike Ford, then vice president of marketing and sales, answered the phone. That’s how small the company was at the time. Autodesk’s most recent annual revenues were $2.17 billion, making it the largest CAD company in the world. Who would have ever guessed that it would go so far?
Through the 1980s and much of the 1990s, Autodesk was viewed as a “second-class citizen” among its high-end competitors and many of their customers. Their comments would imply that if you wanted to do serious drafting and design work, you’d need expensive software from CADAM, Calma, Computervision, Dassault, or Intergraph running on high-end, proprietary, and expensive hardware. Even in the mid to late 1990s, when personal computers and software products, such as AutoCAD, were becoming quite powerful, they were not seen as real solutions to many.
I recall meeting with an established company in Japan in 1997. The company CEO was seeking advice on the future of design and manufacturing. I was surprised when he would not accept the belief that PCs could power his CAD software in the foreseeable future. He tried to convince me that his company could not do intricate design work using anything less than software running on UNIX workstations. At the time, his company was running hundreds of seats.
It’s been interesting to watch the migration from mainframe computers, to the VAX and MicroVAX, then Apollo, Sun, and HP workstations, and now to PCs. Autodesk strengthened and gained respect each step of the way, especially in the last couple years. It goes to show you that one should never underestimate a small company surrounded by industry giants and expensive products. When complacency sets in, almost anything can happen.
Note: Wohlers Talk is a blog that offers views, perspective, and commentary related to rapid product development and a wide range of other topics. Nearly 150 commentaries have been published since February 2003. To view them, visit
Email briefings are distributed four or five times annually. Request
to receive the briefings for free.